Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Technorati button Reddit button Myspace button Linkedin button Webonews button Delicious button Digg button Stumbleupon button Newsvine button
2

[Writing Post] Which is More Pro – Small Press or Self-Pub

Posted by reudaly on September 17, 2014 in Books, Writing |

Welcome to Wednesday – and the week (ish) before FenCon, which means an excessive amount of headless chicken running and maniacal laughter. But it’s coming together so that’s something – but not the point of today’s blog. And fair warning – there’s a couple of “adult” words in here. And shameless plugs for my work…
FourRedheadsOfTheApocalypse_small
Yesterday (Tuesday the 16th) Cat Rambo put up an article on her blog entitled: Why SFWA Should (IMO) Admit Self-Published Writers, and Some Thoughts about the Process. And it’s an interesting and forward-thinking concept on accepting changes in publication. Steve Miller linked to the article on Facebook, as well, which has started your basic firestorm of discussion.
Flush_Fiction_small
For the record, I do not have a problem with creating criteria for self-publishing for “professional” status. A lot of people are jumping on the bandwagon, it’s going to have to happen. What I’ve taken exception to – and have gotten a bit of support is the fact that Small Press is still getting short shrift. Though Cat mentions, once I bring up the point in comments, that Small Press criteria is also being considered – why is it still a FREAKIN’ FOOTNOTE?
FR-Apocalypse_small
I love the Small Presses I work with. Yard Dog Press has been around longer than a lot of “professional” imprints (both traditional and digital), but because it pays in more of an e-book business plan (long before e-pub was a glimmer in anyone’s eyes) of no advance but higher royalties, it’s still somehow considered a Bastard Stepchild. Nor is Yard Dog alone – there are several Small Presses (and bigger ones) that fall into this category that have been around a long, long time.
Cover flattened_small
Why, suddenly, is Self-Pub getting the love and respect of “professional” consideration when presses who fall just under the “accepted” threshold” still considered Second Best? I’ve carved out quite a nice career in Small Press. I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE working with Yard Dog – Selina is a KICK ASS editor who only works with people who are willing to WORK. They pay royalties ON TIME. EVERYTIME. It might not be much – or it might be, depending on the hustle of the author (which is true in the Big Houses, too now) – but it’s consistent and transparent.
RHIL_small
Why is it becoming more acceptable? Is it because of the rise of e-books and the changing face of publishing? Partly. Even Traditional publishing has to account for e-pub. Or is it because some Older Authors who’ve (in some cases) originally looked askance on anything other than Big House/Big Three Publishing are now finding out that they can make money on back lists and companion pieces by doing it themselves has taken the stigma away from “self publishing” – so therefore it MUST BE okay now?
More_Hurl_small
I don’t know – but I do know that I would rather see the hard work that Small Presses do for their authors get recognized by professional organizations on an equal level. And yes, all the covers represented here are Yard Dog titles – and clickable to take you to the page (and aren’t ALL the titles I’m involved with there). I have a couple of self-pub collections, so I am on both sides of this debate. So debate this if you will but keep it civil.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

2 Comments

  • Cat Rambo says:

    I talked about self-publishing because that’s the thing on my mind the most at the moment, and did not mean to imply that small press stuff is unimportant or not worthy of consideration. The effort to revamp the overall criteria includes looking at how qualifying through small press publications — including crowdfundingstuff like Kickstarter — should work as well as whether existing criteria should be revised.

  • Way back in 2003 or 2004, the SFWA membership criteria were changed in such a way that some authors published by ebook or ebook/on-demand presses would have qualified for membership. The moment someone realized this (which was probably when a batch of people submitted membership forms), a special meeting must have been called to revert them back to the old rules because that was where the requirements stood within two months’ time.

    I know of several people who sent in their checks with their applications and never got a refund.

    The sacredness of the advance is a sticking point I don’t see going away anytime soon. Never mind that, like returns, it was started during the Depression to ensure authors didn’t starve to death (or, in the case of Fitzgerald, drink themselves into bankruptcy) before the book could be published. It’s tradition, don’tcha know.

    Ditto for print runs, which is what MWA established as the important criterion when they threw out several digital presses that had previously been approved. By the new rules set up at the time, an author didn’t even have to sell a single book to qualify as a pro as long as they got a thousand-dollar advance and had a 500-copy print run.

Comments are closed. Would you like to contact the author directly?

Copyright © 2007-2024 Rhonda Eudaly All rights reserved.
This site is using the Desk Mess Mirrored theme, v2.5, from BuyNowShop.com.